@conference {634726,
	title = {The complexity of distinguishing Markov random fields},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation (RANDOM {\textquoteleft}08), Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
	volume = {5171},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {331-342},
	publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
	organization = {Springer-Verlag},
	abstract = {
	Markov random fields are often used to model high dimensional distributions in a number of applied areas. A number of recent papers have studied the problem of reconstructing a dependency graph of bounded degree from independent samples from the Markov random field. These results require observing samples of the distribution at all nodes of the graph. It was heuristically recognized that the problem of reconstructing the model where there are hidden variables (some of the variables are not observed) is much harder.



	Here we prove that the problem of reconstructing bounded-degree models with hidden nodes is hard. Specifically, we show that unless NP = RP,



	
		It is impossible to decide in randomized polynomial time if two mod- els generate distributions whose statistical distance is at most 1/3 or at least 2/3.
	
	
		Given two generating models whose statistical distance is promised to be at least 1/3, and oracle access to independent samples from one of the models, it is impossible to decide in randomized polynomial time which of the two samples is consistent with the model.
	



	The second problem remains hard even if the samples are generated efficiently, albeit under a stronger assumption.

},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-85363-3_27},
	author = {Andrej Bogdanov and Elchanan Mossel and Salil Vadhan}
}
